Who's Who

Kateryna Bondar

A Ukrainian defence-technology analyst at CSIS, tracking how Russia and Ukraine are wiring AI, drones and command-and-control into the war.

theoristCenter for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

Listen — profile
0:00 / 1:44

Kateryna Bondar is a senior fellow with the Wadhwani AI Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, where she writes some of the most detailed open analysis of how artificial intelligence, drones and digital command systems are reshaping the war in Ukraine. Much of her recent work examines the software layer of the fight — how Ukraine stitches sensors, drones and human reports into a single operating picture through systems such as Delta , and whether that amounts to a working version of the combined command-and-control architecture the Pentagon calls CJADC2.

Her reporting tracks both sides of the front. She has documented how Russia is standing up a sovereign drone-manufacturing base and pushing toward AI-driven autonomy, and how Moscow is rebuilding its command and control around machine-speed decision-making. The dual perspective is unusual: she treats Ukrainian and Russian adaptation as a single, fast-moving technological contest rather than a one-sided story.

Bondar came to that vantage point through government rather than the think-tank world. Before CSIS she advised the Ukrainian government on defence, financial-sector and innovation reforms, managed Ministry of Defence assistance projects at PricewaterhouseCoopers, and worked on the National Reforms Council and the Reform Support Team at the Ministry of Finance. She was a 2019–2020 fellow of the Ukrainian Emerging Leaders Program at Stanford University and is a Penn Kemble Forum fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy. She holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in international relations from Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Latest writings

  • How Russia Is Building a Sovereign Drone Ecosystem for AI-Driven Autonomy

    CSIS · 2026-04-13

    Russia is fielding AI-enabled autonomous drones at the tactical edge despite lacking a frontier AI programme of its own, according to a CSIS report by Kateryna Bondar. Drawing on Russian policy documents, statements from senior officials, more than 150 Telegram channels, and interviews with Ukrainian operators and outside experts on the Russian armed forces, the paper traces how Moscow has stitched together a national ecosystem for unmanned systems and applied AI — from a presidential decree setting 2030 targets for compute, drone output and AI graduates, to private drone schools that fold frontline feedback into curricula within weeks. The report argues that systems such as the V2U loitering drone, which intercepted units show carry onboard compute but no command link, demonstrate functional autonomy in GPS-denied environments. It documents how Russian developers build on open-weight models from Llama, Mistral, Qwen and DeepSeek, and finds that roughly 69 percent of memory and 57 percent of processors recovered from Russian drones come from US firms. Useful for analysts tracking sanctions, export controls, and the diffusion of battlefield autonomy.

    Listen — summary
    0:00 / 1:23
  • How Russia Is Reshaping Command and Control for AI-Enabled Warfare

    CSIS · 2026-02-10

    Russia is abandoning the ambition of a single, joint-style command-and-control architecture and instead fielding narrow tactical software shaped by the war in Ukraine, according to a new CSIS report by Kateryna Bondar. The paper traces the long-running ACCS programme — the Russian counterpart to the U.S. JADC2 concept — and argues that institutional inertia, Soviet-era research bodies and weak data practices have stalled the integrated vision, even as standardisation around Astra Linux and domestic Elbrus and Baikal processors continues. What is advancing, Bondar finds, is tactical: tools such as the Svod situational-awareness complex and the Glaz/Groza reconnaissance-strike workflow now compress detection-to-fire cycles, with unmanned systems running up to 80 percent of fire missions. AI sits in a support role, mature for computer vision and sensor fusion but still nascent for language tasks, and leans heavily on adapted open-weight models including Mistral, Qwen, LLaMA and YOLO. Useful for analysts tracking Russian military software, drone-artillery integration, and how wartime pressure reshapes C2 doctrine.

    Listen — summary
    0:00 / 1:20
  • Does Ukraine Already Have Functional CJADC2 Technology?

    CSIS · 2024-12-11

    Ukraine's Delta platform has, in practice, delivered much of what the U.S. Department of Defense has been chasing for years under the banner of Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control. This CSIS report by Kateryna Bondar traces how a volunteer-built digital map, started by the Aerorozvidka group in 2016 and transferred to the Ministry of Defense in 2023, grew into a cloud-hosted ecosystem now used across the Ukrainian armed forces, national guard, border service and police. The author walks through Delta's main applications: the Delta Monitor map, the Mission Control scheduler for drone sorties, the UA DroneID friend-or-foe layer, the Delta Tube and Vezha video tools, and the AI-driven Avengers system, which the ministry credits with detecting roughly 12,000 pieces of enemy equipment a week from drone and camera feeds. Bondar also covers secure messaging, mobile device management, planned analytics including a Ukrainian-language chatbot, and interoperability work with NATO systems and Link 16. Useful for defence-tech analysts, military planners and AI practitioners studying battle-management software.

    Listen — summary
    0:00 / 1:17

Watch & listen

Mentioned in

ukraine russia csis command-and-control cjadc2 military-ai drones

Last researched .